A
seasoned writer first mentioned the ugly word ‘ageism’ to me when my first book
came out, asking me if I’d experienced this thing called ‘ageism’ while
hustling my work. I almost said I refuse
to experience ageism. I am simply MYSELF. I’m not a writer-with-a-use-by-date.
Hmmm.
Scoot ahead to the other day when I was filling in the details for a big short
story competition and I saw a space for my age please, on the dotted line. My age? Why? What the -- ?
It’s not
that I have a problem with my age (though I’m not telling you here to prove my
point) but why should it be included in my info for a leading competition? Can’t
you just read the thing? Does that mean all of us ‘well-over-25’ entrants are going
to be turfed out after the first round to make way for a strapping young
prize-winner?
Some people
are slow to bloom. Just read my star sign for example. Capricorn: ages well,
determined, late success, bad knees. It could happen to anyone. You have your
writing dream. You have kids or you work damned hard, you live hard, you read hard. And then it comes. Time, place, voice,
determination. Encouragement. Everything to need to set off the fire in your
belly.
You produce.
You refine your short story. You fill out your entry form and are willing to
pay hard-earned cash and throw yourself out there with the masses.
And then
some cretin asks your age.
It feels
a like a good kick in the knees, eh?
Age
comes into everything, doesn't it? When you're young and inexperienced there’s
a chance you’ll write a certain type of tale, a coming-of-age story perhaps close
to the family woes you’ve lived through. The oldest tale of time, and told
beautifully by some.
And yet,
sometimes, when an older writer comes into their own, he or she may produce the
inverse of this. A work that is just and sage, full of equilibrium. Must we
reject it because it is not dizzy with more immediate delights?
One of
the things I realised when reading a review of ‘Pelt and Other Stories’ is that
many of my characters are 30-ish. Gosh, I hadn’t thought. Is it because that is
where I seem to think people get themselves into interesting pickles? Given
young adulthood can be so plainly raw and is so frequently recorded, and the older
years sometimes more static and tilted towards decline? It’s given me a lot of thought, and I’ve wondered
whether I should push in either direction in future, or whether my subject
material has been subconsciously swayed by what I think a reader might enjoy...
So what does that mean? That I am ageist myself?
Well?! I
don’t know yet. Jury’s still out. But what I do know is that the more I read,
and the broader my own reading experience becomes*, the better equipped I am to
recognise devices, tendencies and outcomes.
Another
tricky day in the life of an ageless author.
*currently
reading ‘Love Begins in Winter’ by Simon Booy